Product Guides

A jurisdiction-aware decision engine that maps your facts to likely visa pathways and produces structured outputs: matches, checklists, warnings, and explainers.

• Answer intake questions precisely (avoid assumptions).
• Review top matches and read the “why” reasoning summary.
• Use the checklist to prepare documentation and identify gaps.
• Read warnings carefully and resolve avoidable risk factors.

• Entering incomplete facts (missing income/source, duration, sponsor details).
• Confusing “eligible” with “approved” (discretion remains).
• Ignoring warnings that require follow-up documentation.

A browsable catalog of Colombian visa categories with structured summaries, constraints, and requirement groupings.

• Filter by visa type and use search for categories and keywords.
• Open a visa card to review the overview and typical requirements.
• Use the library as a reference when comparing options.

• Assuming a category applies without reviewing restrictions.
• Skipping “notes” sections that affect eligibility or documentation.

A single-visa profile page that decomposes requirements, restrictions, validity, and notes into structured blocks.

• Start with the overview, then read requirement blocks top-to-bottom.
• Use notes to capture exceptions and edge-case constraints.
• Confirm which requirements apply to your profile (not all apply to all cases).

• Reading requirements out of context (missing applicability conditions).
• Ignoring document formatting rules (apostille, translations, validity windows).

A side-by-side comparison of visa pathways that highlights tradeoffs: eligibility constraints, documentation burden, typical costs, and restrictions.

• Select 2–3 visas you are realistically eligible for.
• Compare requirements and restrictions line-by-line.
• Use the comparison to decide what evidence you can produce cleanly.

• Comparing visas you are not eligible for (wastes time).
• Overweighting “ease” without considering renewal or restriction risks.

A constrained explanation layer that helps you understand outputs. Norm is a tool inside MARPT, bounded by sources and logic.

• Ask “why” questions about a specific match, checklist item, or warning.
• Request citations and ask for the exact requirement block being referenced.
• Use it to clarify tradeoffs and next steps, not to replace professional review.

• Asking broad questions without context (“Which visa should I pick?”).
• Treating explanations as approvals or guarantees.

A curated library of anonymized case briefs and patterns (when approved) that can reveal process realities, discretion points, and enforcement signals.

• Search for cases similar to your profile and pathway.
• Focus on patterns and risk signals, not anecdotal one-offs.
• Use insights to improve documentation and follow-up questions.

• Assuming a case outcome will generalize to your case.
• Sharing sensitive personal data in a submission.

A short workflow that turns your facts into ranked visa pathways and a checklist you can execute.

• Answer intake questions carefully.
• Open top matches and read reasoning + restrictions.
• Export or note the checklist and start gathering evidence.

• Guessing values or omitting context that affects eligibility.
• Not revisiting results after new facts or documents are available.

Strength scoring is a signal of fit and readiness based on what you provided and what the pathway requires.

• Read the “why” summary: what facts drove the match.
• Use gaps to guide next steps (documents, clarifications, timing).
• Compare top 2–3 options before committing effort.

• Assuming a high score means approval.
• Ignoring restrictions that matter more than score.

A structured requirement list that helps you gather evidence in the right order and avoid missing essentials.

• Start with identity and eligibility proof items.
• Confirm validity windows (bank letters, police certificates, etc.).
• Plan apostilles and translations early when needed.

• Collecting documents too early (expiring before filing).
• Missing formatting rules (notarization, apostille, translation).

Warnings surface common failure points and discretion-sensitive areas that require stronger evidence or professional review.

• Read each warning and identify what evidence would reduce the concern.
• Use Norm to ask for the exact requirement basis and citations.
• If a warning is material, consult a professional before filing.

• Ignoring warnings because the match score is high.
• Assuming “it worked for someone else” applies to your case.

A structured story submission that helps MARPT extract patterns without exposing personal data.

• Write facts and timeline, not opinions.
• Remove names, passport numbers, addresses, and document images.
• Explain what happened and what changed the outcome.

• Including sensitive personal identifiers.
• Submitting too little context to interpret the outcome.

MARPT reviews submissions for relevance, clarity, and safety before publishing a summarized pattern.

• Expect anonymization and summarization before publishing.
• Some submissions are retained privately for internal pattern work.
• Some submissions may be rejected if low-signal or unsafe.

• Assuming every submission will be published.
• Submitting content that is purely speculative or unrelated to immigration process reality.

Patterns are summarized insights that help users anticipate practical risk points and plan better documentation.

• Use patterns to identify what evidence is commonly decisive.
• Look for signals around timing, enforcement, and discretion.
• Cross-check with the relevant visa profile and checklist.

• Overfitting to one case outcome.
• Ignoring official constraints because a case “seemed to work.”

Structured case patterns can support intake consistency, follow-up questioning, and client-facing explainers.

• Use patterns as prompts for better intake questions.
• Build internal checklists that align with MARPT outputs.
• Share high-level patterns with clients to set expectations.

• Treating patterns as dispositive outcomes.
• Relying on case stories without reviewing the visa’s official constraints.

• Confirm you completed intake questions (missing fields reduce matches).
• Try a broader profile: remove optional constraints and rerun.
• Check status for outages.

• Verify your plan on billing.
• Try a hard refresh and sign in again if your session expired.
• If access still fails, contact support.

• Include the page URL and what you expected vs what happened.
• Add a timestamp and your browser/device.
• Use report an issue for the fastest triage.